|
A thoughtful and insightful analysis of the battle for political power, through a potent regional lens. Earle and Merle Black are two of our nation's top political analysts, particularly on southern politics. This book is a political junkie's delight. If you have ever managed, worked on, voted in or followed a political campaign, you'll have a clearer understanding of how changing demographics, regional concerns, and evolving party ideas affect the balance of power after you read this book.
It is this: the political process is broken. Washington is like a giant crashed computer, unresponsive to keystrokes, and unable to cope with serious issues such as Social Security underfunding, the specter of terrorism, financial meltdowns, global warming, corruption, lobbying running rampant, and so on.Americans should read not only this book, but "The American Lie" by Benjamin Ginsberg; "The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution" by Kevin R. That partisan forces are evenly balanced means "ferocious competition" as they rightly point out, leading to a "permanently competitive situation." This doesn't bode well for the future of American democracy, which requires tolerance and compromise to function effectively.What the authors fail to see, however, is the more dangerous, underlying, looming problem with America, of which partisanship is merely a symptom. They write: "the incessant personal attacks mean that especially thick skins are necessary for America's leading politicians." They're right.They map out partisanship: Democrats controlling the Pacific & Northeast, Republicans controlling the South and Mountain states, with the midwest up for grabs. The Black brothers, both professors of political science at different southern universities, have done an excellent job of describing one of America's current ills -- partisanship -- with excellent statistics and research.They have hit on a major flaw with American democracy and describe it accurately. Generally, these are tough, non-partisan looks at a nation in deep denial. And this body of unelected justices has, in many respects, assumed a quasi-legislative role, which was never intended by the Constitution's Framers, because it has the power to strike down any law it deems unconstitutional. The federal system is askew -- ideally state governments should regulate their own economies, but Washington has usurped this power through numerous rulings, often encouraged by the Supreme Court.
Gutzman; "Common Sense II: How to Prevent the Three Types of Terrorism" by myself; "Up To Our Eyeballs"; "Bad for Democracy" by Dana D. Congress is gridlocked. Politics has become "ideologically charged" and point out that America's "unstable power politics generates relentlessly bitter conflicts over a huge range of domestic and foreign policies and motivates activists in both parties to compete fiercely all the time." I see the venom daily -- activists from both sides cutting at each other's throats without being able to compromise. C. Washington is corrupt. There's a dangerous concentration of power in the executive branch in one person -- the president -- and the usual system of checks and balances seems to have come undone. Nelson; "Our Undemocratic Constitution" by Sanford Levinson; "How America Got It Right" by Bevin Alexander (a tough critique of American foreign policy despite the upbeat title). I think the problems are so dangerous that a Second Constitutional Convention is required to fix them, so I have summoned this body, using my authority as a private citizen, and it will convene in Independence Hall, Philadelphia, beginning July 4th, 2009.This book is one part of a bigger puzzle, so keep reading.
The Blacks speak this language; the controlled variable graph cluster.They divide the country into the South, the Northeast, the Pacific Coast and the Midwest. Certain places, certain populations present opportunity. There are millions of voters, thousands of polling places, hundreds of districts and anyone with a basic knowledge of a spreadsheet program can keep a finger on trends and patterns to a greater extent than the highest paid consultants of just a dozen years ago. That model has been soundly retired. Politics in the U.S. Are people truly disaffected with the political experience or just bored. But the well-staffed candidate will no longer waste a dime of ad money in the wrong districts. The issues have not lost their importance.
But it bears pointing out that "participatory" derives from an active verb. The patterns they show are stark. for the past several decades has had the flavor of a pendulum; a slow oscillation driven mostly by indifferent people voicing their disgust with alternate messages. The rest of us will just have to see if we can surprise these hired guns and their finely tuned predictions.Many will complain that the populist notions of participatory democracy have fallen by the wayside; that Tommy Jefferson is spinning in his grave. They examine race, gender, religious affiliation and ethnicity. The campaigns will know well where to spend their money or they will fail. Voter turnouts for TV reality shows tower over those of even general elections. If they are disappointed with the entertainment value of being asked to overthrow their government every November, they'll get no sympathy from candidates and their consultants as they apply the strategies implied by "Divided America."comments invited
They had a great idea for a book on politics beyond the Reign of W, spending the past couple of years assiduously putting together a slew of statistics to back up their professional analysis of current American politics.Then Karl Rove's brilliant strategy imploded, and the electorate turned on the administration, pretty well across the board, though with some demographics more strongly than others. So. it's tough to extrapolate the pre-implosion data (pre-2004) to 2008 and beyond.The book went to press after the 2006 elections, and the authors do mention the results in the Foreward. However, I'm deducting two stars: one because it reads like a college statistics thesis in large part, and another because the data is (to some extent, debateable how much) not relevant for the next political cycle.
|
